eutopic/model-outputs/01-architectural-risk-qwen3.5-9b.md

49 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2026-06-03 21:56:25 +00:00
model: qwen3.5-9b
prompt: model-tests/01-architectural-risk.md
context: AGENTS.md
date: 2026-06-04
---
the three highest-risk architectural choices are the is_admin flag without RBAC
primitives, deferring DMs to v2 via external handles instead of in-app messaging,
and relying on fs storage with no migration plan until after media ingestion is
live.
first, locking down "admin-only surveys" with a single boolean flag on the user
table creates a single point of failure for trust and access control. if you need
to revoke admin rights or split duties later without rewriting the core auth flow,
you are stuck. the risk here is operational lock-in where one person controls all
feedback loops and the app has no mechanism to audit who actually created what. i
estimate a 4060% chance you will face a hard refactor when v2 needs granular
permissions for events or fundraising moderation. mitigate this by designing user
records with an empty policy map {} that maps roles (admin, mod, poster) to action
sets upfront in the schema, even if only one role exists now.
second, handling DMs via external social handle strings means you lose the ability
to resolve addresses within eutopic and force users to leave your app for
conversation. this is a user retention risk because photo comments will naturally
drift toward private chat, but you've built no bridge into that space. it also
complicates v2 scope creep if you later decide to build DMs: you'd need to
retrofit an internal message store or convince users to migrate their existing
external threads. the probability of needing to rewrite the onboarding and profile
flow is 3050%. mitigate this by implementing a minimal internal /messages table
with ephemeral in-app routing (pushed to v2) now, keeping it isolated from the
main feed logic so you can toggle visibility without touching backend routes.
third, storing media on local fs before committing to an s3-compatible abstraction
layer creates silent failure modes when disk space fills up or hardware degrades.
with 550 users each uploading 10 photos at 5mb average, you'll hit a terabyte
wall in ~100 days if growth accelerates. migrating mid-data is painful because of
checksums and broken links. the risk surfaces only after you've ingested critical
community content. i see a 6070% chance this path forces an emergency rewrite
during v2 prep when disk space becomes tight or backups fail. mitigate by mocking
MediaStorage as an interface with fs impl now, but enforce a pre-check on first
upload that writes metadata to a central catalog table and verifies free-space
before accepting the file stream.
you're building something intentional here, but these three decisions will bite if
you ship without planning for their evolution paths.
✻ Crunched for 1m 2s